Sorry! Your answer is wrong. The cost of providing infrastructure to compact development can be as much as 40% lower than for low-density development. For details, please look below at a slide from our Online Sprawl Presentation. Be sure to scroll down the page and click on the "Sources" link for further information.


Back to the quiz
density photos
 

Providing services to residential development, particularly low-density development, costs towns more than they receive back in revenue. Here you see the contrast between low-density and high-density areas.

A study done for Grow Smart Rhode Island in 1999 reported that if Rhode Island chose compact development over sprawl, the state's infrastructure costs could be reduced over the next twenty years by about 40%.

 

Sources